Considering the City: Fight Blight!

Wednesday, October 14th, 2015 at 3:15 PM
Considering the City: Fight Blight! by Lisa Austin and Sue Moyer
Contributed photo

Broken windows, missing doors, sagging porches, peeling paint, collapsing garages, and caved-in roofs attract crime, discourage investment, and lower property values. Not surprisingly, a 2001 study by researchers at Temple University revealed that blighted properties devalue nearby properties; great homes located “within 150 feet of an abandoned unit” almost always suffer exponentially-reduced sales prices. A 2015 study for the City of Erie’s Comprehensive Plan by CZB identified 4,500 blighted properties in the city. According to Mike Baker of the Erie County Department of Planning, there are 48,517 structures in the city of Erie, including garages, sheds, etc. This means almost 10 percent of structures in Erie are blighted. Inevitably, some will be demolished. But many can be saved if we are willing to take action as a community. To fight blight we must: initiate focused code enforcement, pass new ordinances to support code enforcement, and embrace creative homesteading options.


In their “Blight to Bright Toolkit for PA,” the Housing Alliance of Pennsylvania listed these blight reduction benefits: improving the health of residents, raising property values of nearby properties (by as much as 30 percent thus increasing tax revenues), and reducing crime - especially gun-related violence.

Erie’s Code Enforcement

Addressing blighted property begins when a complaint is called in to the Code Enforcement Office (870.1473). According to the City’s Code Enforcement flow chart, drawn up by Officer Tony Maggio to clarify the process, the complaint is investigated by one of the five officers. When a violation is verified, the officer issues an “Order to Correct Code Violation Notice.” Next, after the “allotted time has passed” — the length of which depends, according to Andy Zimmerman, Manager of Code Enforcement, “on the severity (and nature) of the violation” — the officer reinspects the property. If the violation has not been corrected, a citation is filed with the Magisterial District Judge charged with jurisdiction of the political ward in which “the offense took place.” (There are six wards in Erie.) The property owner then has 10 days to “enter a plea of guilty or not guilty.” If the property owner does not respond, a “warrant is issued for arrest.” If the property owner responds with a “not guilty plea,” a “hearing is scheduled and the officer and the property owner each presents his/her case” to the Magisterial District Judge (MDJ). If the MDJ finds the property owner not guilty, the case is closed. If the MDJ finds the property owner guilty, then fines or costs are assessed; but, they may be appealed within 30 days. Another option is that the MDJ may choose to grant the property owner more time to comply by issuing a Continuance. A Continuance requires the scheduling of another hearing with the MDJ and Code Enforcement Officer “to check … for compliance.” At this next hearing, the MDJ may again decide to provide the property owner with another Continuance providing the property owner with an additional 30 or 90 days to comply. This additional Continuance requires another hearing with the MDJ, the property owner, and the Code Enforcement Officer.

Obviously, this lengthy process is not effective in addressing blight.

Housing Court

Other cities have instituted a citywide housing court to help judges to understand the scope of an individual property owner’s violations. The establishment of an Erie Housing Court could eliminate the current practice that seems to be inadvertently promoting blight in Erie.

Quality of Life Ticketing Ordinance

The Housing Alliance of Pennsylvania’s toolkit suggests a “Quality of Life Ticketing Ordinance” to give code enforcement officers the authority to issue tickets and “levy fines for property code violations without a hearing.” The toolkit suggests that officers begin “focused efforts addressing the worst properties,” and publicize their efforts “to encourage compliance” from owners of other neglected properties. The toolkit warns that repeat offenders must be dealt with by creating “progressively higher fines and penalties.”

Doors and Windows Ordinance

The Reinvestment Fund of Philadelphia encouraged their city to enact a “Doors and Windows Ordinance” requiring that “all structures on city blocks with 80 percent occupancy have working doors and windows.” Doors and windows blocked by boards or cinderblocks were fined at a rate of $300 per day per opening. Thus, ten boarded windows would result in a fine of $3,000 a day.

Act 90

Philadelphia enacted Act 90, which permitted the City Housing Court to attach fines to the personal property (held locally or in other municipalities) by the owners of the property found in violation. Such legislation is needed because, as Jeffrey Fraser commented in the Pittsburgh Quarterly, “it’s not unusual for back taxes and penalties to exceed the market value of a house, encouraging owners to ignore investing in its upkeep or to walk away from it entirely.” If Act 90-type legislation were enacted here, fines for a blighted property in the City of Erie (that is owned by someone living in Florida), could be recovered, along with back taxes, via liens on the Florida property.

Timely Action

While being respectful of individual property rights, the community’s rights must also be addressed. Before neglected properties decline beyond reasonable repair, the City of Erie, like the City of Philadelphia, must be given the authority suggested by The Reinvestment Fund of Philadelphia to “transfer ownership to responsible owners through conservatorship, eminent domain, or other tools.” The City could utilize the findings of CZB planners and initially focus code enforcement in the highly visible “tipping point” neighborhoods on East and West Sixth, Eighth, 10th, 12th, and 26th. As these neighborhoods are stabilized, the work could spread. A citywide program could employ members of unions, craftspeople, artists, and student apprentices working in wood, masonry, tile, paint, plaster work, electrical work, plumbing, and construction.

Erie needs bold changes to reduce blight, encourage homesteading and preservation, improve our collective finances, and make the city safer, block by block.

Sue Moyer has worked to revitalize Erie’s neighborhoods for 15 years. She serves as the PA Elm Street Manager for the SNOOPS Neighborhood Association, and served in the same capacity Erie’s Little Italy Neighborhood. She is also the former Executive Director of the Bayfront East Side Taskforce. Lisa Austin, of CivitasErie, is a social-sculptor who co-founded All Aboard Erie, Innovation Erie, and Preservation Erie, and initiated dozens of projects and events including the Made in Erie Marketplace and the Industrial Design Workshops at Blasco Library’s Idea Lab. Austin teaches three-dimensional design and sculpture at Edinboro University. Civitas members can be reached at their website, via Facebook at CivitasErie, by leaving a message at 452.8401, by emailing, and by scheduling a Friday morning meeting at the Civitas office in the Masonic Building, 32 W. Eighth St., Erie, PA.

Additional Photos:

Contributed photoContributed photo

Erie Reader: Vol. 6, No. 22
Now Available — Pick It Up Today


Working to make sense of a crazy year

Looking back on the life of an Erie sports icon. 

Don’t Give up the Ship

At a venue named Erie Playhouse

Phil Buehler’s immersive cyclorama transports Arlington to PACA.


Working to make sense of a crazy year

Looking back on the life of an Erie sports icon. 

Don’t Give up the Ship

At a venue named Erie Playhouse

Phil Buehler’s immersive cyclorama transports Arlington to PACA.

Fred Oakman has proved to be one of the most consistently fantastic, emotionally open songwriters in our region.

The Buki plan, the Viaduct, and Erie CPR 

No drink is an island in this shot-for-shot comparison.

It’s just living an alternative lifestyle.

Erie Philharmonic hosts a ‘Dead Man’s Party’ at the Warner Theatre.